Threat modelling in two hours, not two weeks
Upload a diagram and get a living risk map the same day. Typical first model in two hours for a standard web-app diagram.
Why this slows you down
Its release week, 5pm.
On your screen: one diagram, twenty docs, and a ticking change freeze.
You are the Security Architect asked to threat model a new product that will face customers.
Reviews drag, owners edit docs in parallel, and yesterday's model is already stale.
Slack lights up with 'Are we good to ship?' You must either block the release or approve what you cannot validate.
That is how fast turns fragile.
What you deal with today
What changes with Excalibur
How you get there
- 1Upload architecture and core docs (or start from a template).
- 2Drag paths, set targets and assumptions, preview risk routes.
- 3Validate in sandbox/staging; export evidence; open issues with owners.
What success looks like
Cycle time drops from two weeks to two hours.
Models per week increase without extra headcount.
Design gates ship with evidence, not hunches.
Architects review more products in the same week.
Security and testers engage before production, so the model becomes a launch enabler, not a blocker.
This aligns with recognised risk-communication practice in modern governance.
Threat modelling in two hours, not two weeks
Upload a diagram and get a living risk map the same day. Typical first model in two hours for a standard web-app diagram.
Why this slows you down
Its release week, 5pm.
On your screen: one diagram, twenty docs, and a ticking change freeze.
You are the Security Architect asked to threat model a new product that will face customers.
Reviews drag, owners edit docs in parallel, and yesterday's model is already stale.
Slack lights up with 'Are we good to ship?' You must either block the release or approve what you cannot validate.
That is how fast turns fragile.
What you deal with today
What changes with Excalibur
How you get there
- 1Upload architecture and core docs (or start from a template).
- 2Drag paths, set targets and assumptions, preview risk routes.
- 3Validate in sandbox/staging; export evidence; open issues with owners.
What success looks like
Cycle time drops from two weeks to two hours.
Models per week increase without extra headcount.
Design gates ship with evidence, not hunches.
Architects review more products in the same week.
Security and testers engage before production, so the model becomes a launch enabler, not a blocker.
This aligns with recognised risk-communication practice in modern governance.
Threat modelling in two hours, not two weeks
Upload a diagram and get a living risk map the same day.
Why this slows you down
You get a diagram, twenty docs, and a deadline.
Reviews drag and the output goes stale.
You carry the fear of being the blocker to production.
You make a choice between fast and safe shipping of code.
What you deal with today
What changes with Excalibur
How you get there
- 1Upload architecture and core docs (or start from a template).
- 2Drag paths, set targets and assumptions, preview risk routes.
- 3Validate in sandbox/staging; export evidence; open issues with owners.
What success looks like
Cycle time drops from two weeks to two hours.
Models per week increase without extra headcount.
Design gates ship with evidence, not hunches.
Architects review more products in the same week.
Security and testers engage before production, so the model becomes a launch enabler, not a blocker.
This aligns with recognised risk-communication practice in modern governance.